Caste-based reservations, India (the results, statistics)
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. |
Contents |
Dropout rate
The IITs: 2021
40% belong to SC/ST communities; 88% of IIT Guwahati dropouts, 76% of IIT Delhi from reserved categories.
Almost 63% of the undergraduate dropouts at the top seven Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) over the last five years are from the reserved categories, according to Education Ministry data given in response to a question in the Rajya Sabha. Almost 40% were from the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities. In some institutions, the SC/ST share was as high as 72%.
This indicates that those who drop out of these elite programmes disproportionately belong to the disadvantaged groups, given that only half the undergraduate intake in the IITs are from reserved categories, while about 23% are from the SC/ST communities. Dalit and Adivasi activists have long argued that students from those communities face a higher level of pressure and discrimination at these prestigious institutions.
However, Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan told the Rajya Sabha that the dropouts were “mainly on account of securing seat in other departments or institutions of students choice or on any other personal ground”.
Kerala MP’s query
He was responding to a question from Kerala MP V. Sivadasan regarding undergraduate dropouts at all centrally-funded technical institutions, the variance seen across social categories and the measures taken to address it. The Minister listed “fee reductions, institute scholarships, priority access to national level scholarships to aid students with poor financial backgrounds to pursue their education” among the steps taken to prevent dropouts.
An analysis of the seven IITs that stand in the top 10 of the National Institute Ranking framework shows that the disproportionality of dropouts is starker at some institutions. IIT Guwahati holds the worst record, with 88% of its 25 dropouts hailing from the reserved categories. In fact, almost three-fourths of all dropouts are from the SC/ST communities, although they make up less than a quarter of the students.
Of the 10 students who dropped out of IIT Delhi in 2018, all were from the reserved categories, a trend that holds true for every year except 2019. More than half of all the dropouts in IIT Delhi are from the SC/ST communities and 76% of its dropouts are from the reserved categories.
Top ranked IIT Madras has only had 10 dropouts over the last five years, but six of them have been SC/ST students, while another was from an Other Backward Class community. Overall, 70% of the institution’s dropouts were from the reserved categories
IIT Kharagpur has had the highest number of dropouts, with a whopping 79 students leaving the institution over the last five years. More than 60% are from the reserved categories.
IIT Bombay had the best record, with reserved category dropouts in proportion with their share of the total student intake, although SC/ST students fared worse.
However, Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan told the Rajya Sabha that the dropouts were “mainly on account of securing seat in other departments or institutions of students choice or on any other personal ground”.
Kerala MP’s query
He was responding to a question from Kerala MP V. Sivadasan regarding undergraduate dropouts at all centrally-funded technical institutions, the variance seen across social categories and the measures taken to address it. The Minister listed “fee reductions, institute scholarships, priority access to national level scholarships to aid students with poor financial backgrounds to pursue their education” among the steps taken to prevent dropouts.
An analysis of the seven IITs that stand in the top 10 of the National Institute Ranking framework shows that the disproportionality of dropouts is starker at some institutions. IIT Guwahati holds the worst record, with 88% of its 25 dropouts hailing from the reserved categories. In fact, almost three-fourths of all dropouts are from the SC/ST communities, although they make up less than a quarter of the students.
Of the 10 students who dropped out of IIT Delhi in 2018, all were from the reserved categories, a trend that holds true for every year except 2019. More than half of all the dropouts in IIT Delhi are from the SC/ST communities and 76% of its dropouts are from the reserved categories.
Top ranked IIT Madras has only had 10 dropouts over the last five years, but six of them have been SC/ST students, while another was from an Other Backward Class community. Overall, 70% of the institution’s dropouts were from the reserved categories
IIT Kharagpur has had the highest number of dropouts, with a whopping 79 students leaving the institution over the last five years. More than 60% are from the reserved categories.
IIT Bombay had the best record, with reserved category dropouts in proportion with their share of the total student intake, although SC/ST students fared worse.
Education
In JEE(A), OBC almost equal ‘open category:’ 2017
,_category_and_state-wise.jpg)
Quota Students From State Boards Rule Nos
The IITs, once the preserve of the educated elite in the metros, are witnessing a significant class shift.
As 1.7 lakh bright high school graduates take the IIT JEE (Advanced) on Sunday , data reveals that an almost identical number of open category and OBC candidates have qualified to take this final exam to enter the IITs.
Among aspirants from state boards, the ratio is, in fact, skewed in favour of back ward candidates as against the ones from the general quota. However, the qualifying score for backward candidates is 49 while for open category students it is 81.
In Maharashtra state board, while 4,394 from the ge neral category have made the cut, 7,460 from the OBC category and 4,619 SC candidates will appear for the JEE (Advanced) test. Similar is the case with Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh where a larger chunk of OBCs and the SCs have qualified for the IIT test through their school boards.) Even in case of the Guja rat, Telangana, Andhra, Kar nataka, Kerala and West Beng al state boards, a larger num ber of OBC students is compe ting for IIT seats vis-à-vis those from the open category .
“The make-up of candida tes taking the JEE this year has altered,“ said a JEE cha irman. Historically , CBSE schools have had the largest share of IIT seats, but the trend is changing. In 2012, 57% of candidates admitted were from CBSE, but by 2014, it had dropped to 42%.
This year, 64,000 JEE (Adv) candidates are from the non creamy layer of OBC and 69,000 from the general category . What that will translate to, said a JEE official, would be that several OBCs would qualify under the general category and not take a quota seat.
“Quite a few general category students of the 2.2 lakh who qualified after the JEE (Main) have dropped out and that may also be responsible in narrowing the (gap between) the number of OBC and general category students,“ said an IIT director.
As an individual board, CBSE dominated the merit list of the JEE (Main) exams for qualifying to the next level.Then came state boards like Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Maharashtra which also occupy a thick slice of the pie.
“Several state board schools and junior colleges are realising the importance of tests like JEE and NEET andopting for an integrated approach where students are trained for entrance tests,“ said Ruia College principal Suhas Pednekar.
SC, ST, OBC professors in central universities/2018
Subodh Ghildiyal, Less than 5% of professors are from SCs, STs, March 6, 2019: The Times of India
From: Subodh Ghildiyal, Less than 5% of professors are from SCs, STs, March 6, 2019: The Times of India
No OBCs In Top Teaching Posts
Amid raging debate over the fallout of the Supreme Court judgment on the share of the backward classes in teaching positions in higher education, the government has provided official figures which show abysmal representation of SCs, STs and OBCs in faculties in central universities across the country.
The general categories (upper castes) comprise nearly 95% in posts of “professors” as against 3.54% SCs and 0.86% STs. There are no OBCs in the top teaching positions. The general categories represent 93% of posts of “associate professors” in stark contrast to 5% SCs and 1% STs, with no OBCs at all.
In the juniormost teaching position of “assistant professor”, general categories have a share of 66% as against 12% of SCs and 6% of STs. OBCs here count for nearly 15%. Across three categories, general communities have a share of 75%, SCs 10%, STs 4% and OBCs 10%.
Union ministry of HRD on February 6 provided to the Parliament’s “committee on welfare of OBCs” the caste-wise break up of faculties in higher education institutions. The panel is examining the implementation of reservation policy and if “creamy layer” for OBCs needs to be rationalised. Their representation marks a massive shortfall in comparison to the reservation available to SCs (15%), STs (7.5%) and OBCs (27%). Interestingly, the government recently carved out 10% reservation for the poor among the general communities (upper castes).
Blaming the “system of recruitment and implementation of quota policy” for the low share of backward classes in the faculties, Congress MP B K Hariprasad, who is a member of the OBC panel, said, “Even if SCs, STs and OBCs pass the examinations, there are many pretexts on which they are denied positions. That is the reason behind the deficit in their recruitment and population figures.”
Champions of social justice are concerned that the situation would get worse after the SC ruling that reservation in faculty positions should be calculated department-wise and not by taking the total seats in a university as the basis. Last week, the apex court rejected the government’s appeal against its judgment.
The new faculty quota policy has provoked a strong agitation for the restoration of the old system. Amid protests in Parliament, Union government in the recent budget session assured that it would bring an ordinance to wind the clock back.
2021
August 3, 2021: The Times of India
Over 55% of the sanctioned OBC posts in the 45 central universities and other technical and research organisations are lying vacant. This includes 89.8% of the OBC posts lying vacant in Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. The Union ministry of education (MoE) told the Lok Sabha that over 41% of the SC posts and 39% of the ST posts are also lying vacant in these institutions.
Replying to a written question on the total number of sanctioned and vacant posts in the reserved categories — SC, ST and OBC — in all central universities and research institutions, Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan in a response said being autonomous institutions, “the onus of filling up the vacant posts lies on Central universities.”
On the vacancies minister said: “Now, after implementation of ‘The Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Teachers’ Cadre) Act, 2019’, the OBC reservation has been implemented at all levels. Further, in June 2019 UGC has prepared the Guidelines for Recruitment of Faculty in Universities, Colleges and Institutions Deemed to be Universities outlining the selection procedure and the time frame for recruitment which has been circulated to all Universities to adhere to the guidelines. The UGC on July 31, 2019, August 7, 2019, September 5, 2019 and October 22, 2019 has again requested the universities to ensure that vacant positions in university as well as colleges affiliated to University are filled at the earliest.”
As per the data provided by the ministry, as on April 1, 2021 the OBC vacancies are highest in central universities, Indira Gandhi National Open University, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISERs) and Indian Institute of Science (IISc) which is well above 50%.
'Merit, the dilution of'
2017: Management/ NRI cut-offs way below OBC,SC,ST
Rema Nagarajan, Money, not quota, dilutes merit in med admissions, June 11, 2018: The Times of India
“Government seats’” cut-offs at private medical colleges were well below OBC cut-offs at government medical colleges and only marginally better than SC cut-offs at government medical colleges
From: Rema Nagarajan, Money, not quota, dilutes merit in med admissions, June 11, 2018: The Times of India
Higher The Fees, Lower The Avg NEET Score
It is not caste-based reservation but money that compromises merit in medical admissions. This is obvious from the difference of about 140 marks, or close to 20 percentage points, between the average NEET scores of admissions to over 39,000 government-controlled seats and those to the over 17,000 management and NRI quota seats in private colleges where fees determine admission.
TOI analysed details of nearly 57,000 students admitted to 409 colleges last year. The average NEET score of students in government-controlled seats was 448 out of 720, while the quotas under private control averaged just 306.
Incidentally, the average score of students admitted under the SC quota in government colleges was 398 and the overall average for SC students in all colleges was 367, both much higher than the overall average for privately controlled seats.
The conclusion that it is high fees that are driving this dilution of merit in private college admissions comes from looking at how fees and NEET scores are correlated (see graphic). The higher the range of fees, the lower the average NEET score.
As a result, the NRI quota, which typically has the highest fees, has the lowest NEET scores, a mere 221 on average.
Avg score in govt med colleges is 487
As a result, the NRI quota, which typically has the highest fees, has the lowest NEET scores, a mere 221 on average. The correlation between fees and NEET scores can be seen even in government colleges, some of which have started charging fees beyond the means of even middle-class families. The average score of students in government colleges where the annual fee is less than Rs 50,000, was 487, whereas for those with fees of a lakh or more, it was 372.5.
Assam vis-à-vis UP: how merit is being compromised by money
2017 figures
From: Rema Nagarajan, Med seats: Why pure merit works in Assam, not in UP, June 11, 2018: The Times of India
If medical admissions were entirely merit based what would be the cut-off percentile required to fill all seats? Without the entire list of NEET qualified students in the country, gauging this cut-off percentile is an exercise in approximation. However, the list of students who qualified from Andhra Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Assam, Kerala and Telangana are available in the public domain. An analysis of these shows that for all categories other than ST, even an 88th percentile cut-off (equivalent to a score of 340) would have ensured enough and more students qualified to fill seats available. For the ST category, this would be true at about the 75th percentile or above a score of 234.
The cases of Assam and UP are particularly illuminating to show how merit is being compromised severely by money in medical admissions. Assam has no private colleges, while UP has no government quota in its 22 private colleges with 2800 seats.
An analysis of NEET scores shows that in Assam, only 49 of the 603 students admitted were below the cut-offs that would have been needed (from 93rd percentile for unreserved to 74th for ST) to fill all the seats available if merit alone mattered and all students who qualified were willing to join.
In contrast, in UP, over 2,900 of the 4,908 students admitted were below the cut-offs calculated on the basis of merit (from 97th for unreserved and OBC to 75th for ST). About 95% of these students were in the private colleges in UP.
This happens because many high-scoring students from the different categories cannot afford the exorbitant fees charged by private medical colleges and are forced to drop out despite merit. This allowed rich students with scores as low as 17-18% at the 50th and 40th percentile cutoffs to grab the seats.
Instead of fixing the cut-off percentile based on the number of seats available and the marks scored by students in each year, the health ministry and the Medical Council of India fixed the cut-off in advance at 50th and 40th percentile. To make matters worse, with no stipulation on minimum marks in each subject, students with single digit marks in chemistry and physics, and a few with even zero and negative marks in these subjects have qualified and got admission. Despite this being brought to the notice of the health ministry and the MCI, the system remains unchanged.
In 2018, the eligibility scores fell even further to 119 (16.5%) and 96 (13.3%) for the unreserved and reserved categories respectively. “At this rate, they might as well remove the cutoff and say that anyone writing NEET will be eligible. Seats are still being sold thanks to such low cut-offs,” remarked Jawahar Shanmugham, petitioner in a case against the high fees in deemed universities.
Even with the government helping colleges fill the highpriced seats by keeping cut-offs as low as possible, many private colleges in Karnataka, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra were in the news in 2017 for being unable to fill NRI seats, and in some cases even management quota seats, which forced them to slash fees. The seats remained vacant not because there weren’t meritorious students, but because there weren’t enough of them willing to pay such high fees.
Unsurprisingly, the biggest beneficiaries of the management and NRI seats are students from the unreserved category, accounting for over 60% of these seats (10,373 out of 17,243). OBCs account for almost 29% and SC and ST together amount to just 3%. The average score of unreserved students getting private seats (361.5) is less than the average score of SC category students in government colleges (367).
