Sanskriti School, New Delhi
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. |
Can school for bureaucrats’ children be public-funded?
The Times of India, Oct 30 2015
Abhinav Garg
Sanskriti School case: Nine years on, HC reserves order
Can the state divert free land and public money to an individual or a society to establish a school reserved for children of elite government servants? The fate of Delhi's reputed Sanskriti School will now be tested on this legal premise. The Delhi high court reserved its verdict on a case it started suo motu and converted into a PIL in 2006.
Surprisingly ,even though the issue was taken up suo motu, it took over nine years for the HC to reach the stage of wrapping up proceedings to pave the way for a verdict on the school, set up by wives of top bureaucrats.
A bench of Justices Pradeep Nandrajog and Mukta Gupta conducted a marathon hearing of two hours to conclude the matter on the very first day of its listing before them. The bench indicated the broad contours its impending verdict will deal with -legality of state funding for land and building construction of Sanskriti School and concession up to 40% in fee charged from children of group A officers. HC is also likely to decide if a quota of 60% seats for group A officers is valid or not.
The thrust of the court's inquiry has been to examine why the government is routing large public resources to a school not accessible to children belonging to the weaker sections of the society. Rejecting the arguments that the grant of Rs 10 crore is towards capital expenses, the court had on an earlier occasion asserted that government resources should be made available firstly to the weaker sections of society .
In the last effective hearing held two years ago, then Chief Justice NV Ramana had questioned why departments and ministries were vying with each other to fund the school. HC has already examined the school's management and pattern of admission and the verdict is expected to have a bearing on both.
On its part, the school has fielded a battery of lawyers including Union minister Arun Jaitley who had challenged the court's powers to examine a budgetary provision by Parliament. The institute has maintained that only 60% of seats are for the children of group A officers, while 10% for general public, 5% for staff and 25% for EWS category .
Nov 2015: HC ends quota for bureaucrats' children
The Times of India, Nov 07 2015
Abhinav Garg
HC ends quota for bureaucrats' kids in Sanskriti
It's like racial segregation in US of 1960s
The Delhi high court on Friday ended the nearly two-decade-old system of reservations for children of bureaucrats in the FULL COVERAGE: P 4 city's Sanskriti School, likening it to racial segregation of students in 1960s' US. A bench of Justices Pradeep Nandrajog and Mukta Gupta quashed the 60% quota for wards of Group-A central service officers and said it violated constitutional provisions of equality and Right to Education .
“Sanskriti has been promoted as a school primarily for children of Group-A offi cers... This is analogous to the scenarios in Brown and Keyes cases (involving segregation of white and black students in the US),“ the court observed. It directed the Centre to immediately implement the verdict or convert the school into a Kendriya Vidyalaya if it wanted to maintain it as a preserve for kids of government employees. The court noted that in India, “the circle of ci tizens has to be broadened and the children of whatever parentage be...educated to be one harmonious people“.
By reserving 60% of the seats, the school had created an “arbitrary separation“ between the children of Group-A officers and other students, the court said, stressing that “the State cannot provide funds to any private individual to establish a school for an elite segment of society .“
The bench rejected the justification of the government that the school aims to provide stable schooling to children of All India Service officers whose assignments “fluctuate“ between different geographic locations in India. It pointed out that this predicament was being faced by persons engaged in other branches of the Indian services. If children of group-A officers could not be accommodated in the Kendriya Vidyalayas due to shortage of seats, “another KV could have been established on the land given free of cost to the civil services society.“
Drawing on the two affidavits filed by the Centre during the nine-year-long hearings initiated suo motu by it, HC observed that the real reason for setting up the school was that the top services wanted “good schools“ and “elite schools“ for their wards.
The court said a 60% quota for bureaucrats “creates a limited notion of diversity and merely separates group-A Union government officers from an otherwise similar category of students“.
“Thus, a classification that includes merely children of group-A Union government officers bears no merit. In sum, the respondents' separate treatment of aforesaid classification of children violates both the spirit of equal protection under Article 14 of the Constitution and the spirit of equality of education under Article 21A,“ the bench said It also noted that the school charges 40% less fee from children of group-A officers of the Union government as compared to other children.The bench said the government had “failed to show“ that no alternative means were available by which it could have created “a balance between children of the aforesaid officers, children of persons in other branches of the Indian services, and children of the general category“.
Under the current system, the school reserves 60% of the seats for children of Group-A officers, 25% for economically weaker sections, 10% for general students and 5% for staff children.
The court resented the fact that the “privileged, who can afford to buy education, have access to high-quality schools while the poor and marginalised are left to wallow in ill-equipped schools set up by municipalities, gram panchayats and the government“.
