View source for Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs)

{| class="wikitable"
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%">
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/>
</div>
|}




=History=
==1961-2021==
[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL/2021/10/18&entity=Ar00703&sk=AEEBD3E7&mode=text  Oct 17, 2021: ''The Times of India'']

[[File: IIM Ahmedabad.jpg|IIM Ahmedabad <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL/2021/10/18&entity=Ar00703&sk=AEEBD3E7&mode=text  Oct 17, 2021: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]

[[File: IIM Calcutta.jpg|IIM Calcutta <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL/2021/10/18&entity=Ar00703&sk=AEEBD3E7&mode=text  Oct 17, 2021: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]

[[File: Notable IIM alumni.jpg|Notable IIM alumni <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL/2021/10/18&entity=Ar00703&sk=AEEBD3E7&mode=text  Oct 17, 2021: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]

''How the IIMs became India Inc’s talent shop''

''' The institutes were set up to groom PSU managers, but their bright graduates had other plans right from the start, and that turned out to be a good thing '''

The Indian Institutes of Management, along with their siblings, the IITs, are widely regarded as a string of jewels in India’s crown. They’ve helped establish a reputation for Indian managerial prowess globally, with several of their alumni occupying top slots in the world’s leading organisations. And they’ve played a key role in creating a culture of managerial excellence within much of corporate India.

Sixty years after their establishment, it’s possible to see the legacy of IIMs as being stronger than that of the other ‘Temples of Modern India’. It’s interesting to note the original purpose of the IIMs was, in fact, to supply high priests to these very temples. However, from an early day, IIM graduates succumbed to the superior attractions of MNCs; it seems only 5-odd students from the 120-strong 1971-73 batch of IIMA opted for a PSU job. Nehru expressed much frustration at this tendency. In a convocation address to an early batch of IIT Kharagpur, he fumed: “We take all the trouble to put up this expensive institute and train people here, and then, if we do not utilise the services of those people, then there is something wrong… Such state of affairs can only be described as fantastically stupid.” One can presume he’d have had similar feelings towards IIMs.

However, the IIMs’ departure from their intended purpose may have been a good thing, not just for them but for the nation. It gave Indian managers a global stage to show their talents, in the process raising not just the stature of the IIMs worldwide, but also the managerial standards of Indian businesses domestically, with a slew of Indian companies adopting managerial practices on a par with the world’s best.

As the IIM brand has become more coveted, and the competition to get in progressively more intense, it has expanded dramatically. The older IIMs have almost trebled the capacity of their core two-year courses, apart from adding several shorter specialised courses. And over the past two decades the government has gone in for new launches, raising the number of IIMs from just 4 in the first 25 years of their existence, to a total of 20 in the next 25. In the process, the capacity of the IIMs has increased more than ten-fold, from around 400 annually for the core two-year programme, to over 4,000 today. Unfortunately, despite this massive increase in intake, the competition for entry remains nearly as intense as it was 50 years ago, with over two lakh applications – a multiple of 50 times the capacity.

This extreme level of selectivity in admission leads some people, like Jairam Ramesh in an interview some time ago, to argue that the IIMs owe their stature more to the quality of their student intake than to their inherent quality of teaching or research. I tried to probe perceptions on this subject in conversations with 10-odd alumni from various batches and found that opinions varied. The fact is that with greater autonomy, the IIMs have been able to raise faculty compensation substantially to attract better talent. However, even now, an associate professor’s salary at IIMA or IIMC starts at Rs 17 lakh per annum despite the requirement of at least 6 years of teaching experience after a PhD – a figure that’s on a par at best with what the average passing-out student gets. Even with supplementary income from consultancy, their remuneration doesn’t appear to be comparable with that of their industry peers. This does suggest the likelihood of the best minds eschewing a teaching job for a corporate career.

''' Managers more than entrepreneurs '''

In terms of the overall contribution of IIM graduates, there’s no denying their role in raising managerial standards across Indian industry, and of making the quality of Indian management acumen shine on the world stage. However, their track record in terms of entrepreneurship is less impressive. A recent ET article quoting research by EMA Partners, a consultancy, says the IITs have together produced 78 of the 153 founders of India’s 63 unicorns; the IIMs have contributed only 21, most of whom are from an IIT anyway. This seems a bit odd, because it’s the IIMs’ business to prepare businessmen, far more than the IITs’.

The vastly better record of IIM graduates as managers than as start-up entrepreneurs deserves some thought. One contributing factor could be the IIMs’ admission process which progressively places a premium on qualities like diligence and discipline, far more than on lateral thinking, creativity and comfort with ambiguity. In other words, traits that are far more suited for working within large, structured corporations than starting new enterprises in today’s ever-changing VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity) world.

Forty-five years ago, when I sat for the IIM entrance test, there was no way to prepare for it beyond studying a few GMAT test papers, since testprep had not yet become an organised industry. This allowed many maverick but bright people to squeeze through, perhaps resulting in a more eclectic and creatively-charged environment on campus. But today even the brightest student has no hope of getting through, unless they put in months of serious CAT preparation. Besides, school and college grades matter far more today, and we know how correlated these grades are with a propensity for hard work. The result is a set of students that are of course bright enough to make the cut, but also pre-selected for qualities that possibly make them better suited for structured management than free-wheeling enterprise.

The IIMs should consider modifying the admission process a bit, to allow for a more diverse intake of students (today over 90% are engineers) and varied skills and temperaments. Not only could this make for a more eclectic student culture – a better environment for personal growth – it could better sow the seeds for future entrepreneurs. Or managers of the future, for that matter, given the way even established companies must increasingly adapt to the vagaries and vicissitudes of the VUCA world.

''' Teach biz where business is '''

Another aspect that probably needs examination is the steady proliferation of IIMs across the country, as if to allow each state its own crown jewel. While this sounds like an egalitarian thing to do, its wisdom needs to be challenged. Unlike most other forms of education – including technology – which can be managed within a selfcontained ecosystem, management education needs a serious amount of integration with the industry outside. In the form of visiting faculty that brings live industry experiences to bear on the classroom, through regular interactions with local businesses via short-term projects, and so on.

The local business environment of the city in which a B-school is located clearly has a significant impact on the school. The fact that IIM Bangalore has overtaken IIM Calcutta over the decades in most B-school rankings may well have something to do with the fact that, as a corporate centre, Bengaluru has prospered in this period, while Kolkata has stagnated. Similarly, some alumni of the newer IIMs like Raipur and Rohtak that I spoke to said the absence of strong local businesses to connect with was a clear disadvantage. Even more troubling to the students was the difficulty of attracting visiting faculty or recruiters to their relatively remote locations, as compared with the older IIMs located in cities that were more likely to be on these visitors’ regular travel map.

It’s worth asking why the additional IIM capacity could not have been created through, say, another large campus of IIMC or IIMB within these cities, or by opting for large business centres like Mumbai and Hyderabad, or for that matter Jaipur or Nagpur, rather than remote locations like Bodh Gaya and Sambalpur. It’s not as if a far-flung new IIM helps the cause of its state’s students in any real way. A student from Odisha would surely prefer to go to the best IIM they can crack rather than Sambalpur.

It must, however, be said in conclusion that some possible course-correction apart, the IIMs appear well placed to continue to steer Indian industry in its journey towards global superpowerdom. In the words of IIMA’s motto, Vidya Viniyogada Vikasa, may they continue to spread “development through the application of knowledge”.

''The author studied at IIM Calcutta from 1977 to 1979''


'''60 YEARS, 20 CAMPUSES'''

1961 Calcutta and Ahmedabad

1973 Bangalore

1984 Lucknow

1996 Kozhikode and Indore

2007 Shillong

2010 Rohtak, Ranchi and Raipur

2011 Tiruchirappalli, Kashipur and Udaipur

2015 Nagpur, Amritsar, Bodh Gaya, Sirmaur, Visakhapatnam and Sambalpur

2016 Jammu

=Autonomy=
==2017: full autonomy, will award degrees, not diplomas==
[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=IIMs-to-get-full-autonomy-will-award-degrees-25012017001080  IIMs to get full autonomy, will award degrees, not diplomas, Jan 25, 2017The Times of India]


The Cabinet cleared a bill to grant the prestigious Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) complete autonomy to run their affairs and award degrees to their graduates. Once the bill is passed by Parliament, IIMs will also be declared `institutions of national importance’.

The Indian Institutes of Management Bill, 2017, does away with the government's role in running premier business schools. All powers will be vested in 15-member boards at every IIM. Also, the bill has no provision for reservation in faculty jobs, apart from stating that the recruitment policy should be inclusive. Reservation in admission for SCsSTsOBCs in IIMs will be as per existing norms. The move comes after months of wrangling between the HRD ministry and the Prime Minister's Office on the bill's autonomy provisions.

The Cabinet cleared the IIM bill in the absence of HRD minister Prakash Javadekar. Sources close to him said Javadekar had a phone conversation with PM Narendra Modi and had taken leaves for his son's wedding in Pune. However, a former cabinet secretary said, “I have never seen the subject of a ministry being taken up in the absence of the minister. The entire Cabinet should be briefed.“

Shortly after the decision, PM Modi tweeted, “The IIM Bill focuses on complete autonomy , effective administration, more alumni participation and many other areas.“ Javadekar hailed the decision as a “historic one“ which would give IIMs real autonomy and power to grant degrees. “We trust excellence and quality . This reflects vision of the Modi government for higher education,“ he tweeted.

According to the bill, the responsibility of running each IIM will be vested in its board headed by a chairperson, who will be an eminent person from the field of educationindustry science or technology . Apart from the chairperson, each board will have a representative for the HRD ministry , one for the state government, four eminent persons, four alumni, one member of the IIM society , two faculty members and a director who will be an ex-officio member. At least one member of the board should be either from the scheduled castes or scheduled tribes and three members should be women. The board will have the power to select the director.

The chairperson will have the power to invite experts for meetings but not the power to vote. The bill also provides for review of the performance of IIMs by independent agencies and auditing by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG). On the lines of the IIT council, there will be a Coordination Forum of IIMs (CFIs). It will be a 33-member body headed by a chairperson with a two-year term.

==‘Institutions of national importance,’ can set up campuses abroad==
[http://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2017%2F12%2F20&entity=Ar01704&sk=F9E7868E&mode=text  Manash Gohain, IIMs can grant degrees, set up campuses abroad, December 20, 2017: ''The Times of India'']


The Rajya Sabha on Tuesday unanimously passed a bill declaring Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) as “institutions of national importance” and allowing them to grant degrees and set up campuses abroad.

Advocating more autonomy to the premier management institutions, HRD minister Prakash Javadekar had introduced the Bill in the Lok Sabha on February 9, were is it was passed unanimously. Providing statutory powers to the IIMs, the Bill enables the institutions to “set up centres of management studies and allied areas outside India in accordance with guidelines laid

down by the central government from time to time and in accordance with the provisions of the laws in force in such foreign country”.

While the board of governors (BOG) will now be the principal executive body of each IIM, the Bill also empowers the IIMs to appoint their own chairperson. Instead of the Centre, the Board will now appoint the director (now termed as chief executive officer) of each IIM. Also the searchcum-selection committee to be constituted by the Board will consist of the chairperson and three members from among eminent administrators, industrialists, educationists, scientists, technocrats and management specialists.

The BOG of each IIM shall consist of a chairperson, one nominee each of the Centre and the state government, four eminent persons (including a woman) distinguished in the field of education, industry, commerce, social service or public administration. Two faculty members, one member from SC or ST sections and up to five people co-opted from the alumni or who are members of the society of the existing institute would also be members of the board. There would be at least three women members.

=Dropout rates: 2014-16=
[[File: The Indian Institutes  of Management with the highest number of dropouts in 2014-16.jpg| The Indian Institutes  of Management with the highest number of dropouts in 2014-16 [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?eid=31808&id=30_11_2016_011_024_003&type=P&artUrl=STATOISTICS-IITs-and-IIMs-lost-1900-students-in-30112016011024 : November 30, The Times of India]|frame|500px]]


'''See graphic''':

''The Indian Institutes  of Management with the highest number of dropouts in 2014-16''

=Male: female student ratio=
==2021, 22==
[[File: The male- female student ratio at the IIMs in 2021, 22.jpg|The male- female student ratio at the IIMs in 2021, 22 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/article-share?article=18_07_2022_010_003_cap_TOI  Hemali Chhapia, July 18, 2022: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]


'''See graphic''':

'' The male- female student ratio at the IIMs in 2021, 22 ''

[[Category:Education|I INDIAN INSTITUTES OF MANAGEMENT (IIMS)
INDIAN INSTITUTES OF MANAGEMENT (IIMS)]]
[[Category:India|I INDIAN INSTITUTES OF MANAGEMENT (IIMS)
INDIAN INSTITUTES OF MANAGEMENT (IIMS)]]
[[Category:Pages with broken file links|INDIAN INSTITUTES OF MANAGEMENT (IIMS)]]

=Staff issues=
==2016: 13 out of 20 IIMs functioning without directors==
[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=13-out-of-20-IIMs-without-directors-govt-22112016015020  13 out of 20 IIMs without directors, govt informs LS, Nov 22 2016 : The Times of India]


Government in Nov 2016 admitted that 13 out of 20 IIMs are functioning without directors.

In a written reply in Lok Sabha, minister of state for HRD Mahendra Nath Pandey said IIMs in Bengaluru, Kozhikode, Rohtak, Ranchi, Raipur, Udaipur, Tiruchirappalli, Amritsar, Sirmaur, Bodh Gaya, Sambalpur, Nagpur and Visakhapatnam are without directors.

As already reported by TOI, in case of 10 of the 13 IIMs, HRD ministry has been sitting on the names shortlisted by the search-cum-selection committees for over six months now. In fact, names of directors of four IIMs -Raipur, Bangalore, Rohtak and Ranchi -were sent to department of personnel & training (DoPT) by Smriti Irani during her last days as HRD minister. However, after the reshuffle, DoPT returned the files to the HRD ministry for consideration of Prakash Javadekar. He is yet to decide on the names. In case of other IIMs without directors -except Kozhikode and Udaipur -even government admitted in Parliament that search-cum-selection committee had already provided the names of shortlisted candidates. “Shortlisted names are with the ministry for long,“ one source said.

The ministry maintained that work of IIMs is going on smoothly as directors of the mentor IIMs are looking after the six new IIMs (IIM Amritsar, IIM Sirmaur, IIM Bodh Gaya, IIM Sambalpur, IIM Nagpur and IIM Visakhapatnam), till the appointment of regular director. For other IIMs, the tenure of the outgoing director has been extended or the seniormost professor of the institute has been given additional charge of the post of director.

[[Category:Education|I 
INDIAN INSTITUTES OF MANAGEMENT (IIMS)]]
[[Category:India|I 
INDIAN INSTITUTES OF MANAGEMENT (IIMS)]]