Tutors, private tuition and coaching: India - Revision history

Jyoti: /* Legality */

2020-09-24T10:20:14Z

‎Legality

Jyoti: /* Year-wise trends */

2020-09-21T08:53:59Z

‎Year-wise trends

Jyoti at 18:49, 15 April 2019

2019-04-15T18:49:26Z

Jyoti at 09:47, 26 November 2018

2018-11-26T09:47:01Z

Pdewan at 10:01, 22 November 2018

2018-11-22T10:01:19Z

Pdewan at 09:59, 22 November 2018

2018-11-22T09:59:31Z

Pdewan: /* 7.1 cr students take coachings: NSSO */

2018-11-22T09:55:42Z

‎7.1 cr students take coachings: NSSO

Pdewan: Pdewan moved page Private tuitions and coaching: India to Tutors, private tuition and coaching: India without leaving a redirect

2018-11-22T09:52:27Z

Pdewan moved page Private tuitions and coaching: India to Tutors, private tuition and coaching: India without leaving a redirect

Jyoti: Jyoti moved page Private coachings: India to Private tuitions and coaching: India without leaving a redirect

2016-12-07T20:35:54Z

Jyoti moved page Private coachings: India to Private tuitions and coaching: India without leaving a redirect

Jyoti at 20:35, 7 December 2016

2016-12-07T20:35:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:20, 24 September 2020
Line 26:		Line 26:

	Noting that there is no adequate machinery to check these illegal activities and initiate action, Justice Subramaniam said, “higher officials, who have knowledge about these activities, are remaining as mute spectators. Those higher officials are also committing a misconduct by not initiating proper actions against these public servants”. Observing that decent salary is being paid to these teachers by the government from the tax-payers money, the court added that they had a moral duty towards the society.		Noting that there is no adequate machinery to check these illegal activities and initiate action, Justice Subramaniam said, “higher officials, who have knowledge about these activities, are remaining as mute spectators. Those higher officials are also committing a misconduct by not initiating proper actions against these public servants”. Observing that decent salary is being paid to these teachers by the government from the tax-payers money, the court added that they had a moral duty towards the society.
		+
		+	=Stage at which students seek private tuition=
		+	== As in 2017-18==
		+	[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2020%2F07%2F21&entity=Ar01402&sk=D56B317B&mode=text Surojit Gupta, Secondary-level students take coaching most: Survey, July 21, 2020: ''The Times of India'']
		+
		+	[[File: The stage at which students seek private tuition, as in 2017-18..jpg\|The stage at which students seek private tuition, as in 2017-18. <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2020%2F07%2F21&entity=Ar01402&sk=D56B317B&mode=text Surojit Gupta, Secondary-level students take coaching most: Survey, July 21, 2020: ''The Times of India'']\|frame\|500px]]
		+
		+	Secondary level students topped the number of students taking private coaching with 31% males and 29% female students taking recourse to this method, a recent NSSO survey has shown.
		+
		+	The report also showed that nearly 20% students attending pre-primary and above level (21% of males and 19% of females) were taking private coaching.
		+
		+	According to the final report of the 75th round of the survey information was collected on whether a student was taking/had taken private coaching relating to the basic course. Private coaching might be taken by a student individually or in a group, at home or in any other place, by a single or more tutors.
		+
		+	Private coaching is a thriving business across the country and according to a 2016 NSSO report more than 7.1 crore students were taking private coaching or tuition classes in addition to their basic education.
		+
		+	At the pre-primary level 11.6% of students across the country were taking private coaching but this number rose gradually at the upper primary and middle level to 21.9% and rose to 30.2% at the secondary level. It then tapered to 27.5% at the higher secondary level.
		+
		+	Experts attributed the trend of a larger share of students at the secondary level taking recourse to private coaching to the entrance exams for professional courses such as engineering and medicines.
		+
		+	Anil Swarup, former secretary school education in the ministry of human resource development, explained the increase of students taking private coaching to the different competitive examinations and said this was a result of the dichotomy between learning and understanding.
		+
		+	[[Category:Culture & Learning\|T TUTORS, PRIVATE TUITION AND COACHING: INDIA
		+	TUTORS, PRIVATE TUITION AND COACHING: INDIA]]
		+	[[Category:Education\|T TUTORS, PRIVATE TUITION AND COACHING: INDIA
		+	TUTORS, PRIVATE TUITION AND COACHING: INDIA]]
		+	[[Category:India\|T TUTORS, PRIVATE TUITION AND COACHING: INDIA
		+	TUTORS, PRIVATE TUITION AND COACHING: INDIA]]

	=Year-wise trends=		=Year-wise trends=

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 ==2014: 7.1 cr students take coaching==
 [[File: % of students attending private coaching, state-wise, 2014.jpg|% of students attending private coaching, state-wise, 2014; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=STATOISTICS-DOES-TELANGANA-HAVE-INDIAS-BEST-SCHOOLS-07042016008024 ''The Times of India''], April 7, 2016|frame|500px]]
 [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=71cr-students-take-pvttuitions-NSSO-report-Parallel-05042016001058 ''The Times of India''], Apr 05 2016
@@ Line 46: / Line 47: @@
 At the state level, there was wide variation in the shares of students attending private coaching classes. The highest share was reported from Trip ura (81%) followed by West Bengal (78%). Expenditures on private coaching were also relatively high in these states while spending on course fees was on the lower side.
-The survey found that students in govt. schools were spending more on private coaching with share such spend rising to 33% of the family's total spend on education when the kids were at the secondary stage. The flip side of the coin is that spending on education in private unaided institutions was 22 times that of government institutions
+The survey found that students in govt. schools were spending more on private coaching with share such spend rising to 33% of the family's total spend on education when the kids were at the secondary stage. The flip side of the coin is that spending on education in private unaided institutions was 22 times that of government institutions.
 ===State-wise figures===
 [[File: Private coachings in India, state-wise.jpg| Private coachings in India, state-wise ; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=24_07_2015_009_030_001&type=P&artUrl=STATOISTICS-COACH-FACTORY-24072015009030&eid=31808 ''The Times of India''], July 24, 2015|frame|500px]]
-See graphic, ' Private coachings in India, state-wise' (these figures, to, seem to be from the 2014 survey.
 =See also=
 [[Education: India]]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 [[Category:India |T ]]
 [[Category:Culture & Learning |T ]]
 =Year-wise trends=

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 |}
 [[Category:Education|T ]]
 [[Category:India |T ]]
 [[Category:Culture & Learning |T ]]
@@ Line 35: / Line 33: @@
 [[File: Private coachings in India, state-wise.jpg| Private coachings in India, state-wise ; Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Gallery.aspx?id=24_07_2015_009_030_001&type=P&artUrl=STATOISTICS-COACH-FACTORY-24072015009030&eid=31808 ''The Times of India''], July 24, 2015|frame|500px]]
 See graphic, ' Private coachings in India, state-wise' (these figures, to, seem to be from the 2014 survey.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{| Class="wikitable"
+{| class="wikitable"
 |-
 |colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%">
 This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/>
 </div>
 |}
-[[Category:India |P ]]
-[[Category:Culture & Learning |P ]]
+[[Category:India |T ]]
 =Year-wise trends=

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 =Trends=
-==7.1 cr students take coachings: NSSO==
+==2014: 7.1 cr students take coaching==
 [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=71cr-students-take-pvttuitions-NSSO-report-Parallel-05042016001058 ''The Times of India''], Apr 05 2016
@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 Arecent NSSO report has taken the veil off what is called the shadow education system -private coaching and tuition, outside and parallel to the mainstream education system. The number of students taking such coaching classes or tuitions is estimated at 7.1 crore, almost 26% of the total number of students in the country .Of these, 4.1 crore are boys and 3 crore are girls.
 The report estimates that about 11% to 12% of the total expenditure incurred by families goes for private coaching or tuitions. Contrary to expectation, poorer sections of society take recourse to pri vate coaching of kids practically as much as richer families, the report says. These details emerge from the NSSO report based on a survey of 66,000 households conducted in the first half of 2014.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 7 December 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:
	[[Category:India \|P ]]		[[Category:India \|P ]]
	[[Category:Culture & Learning \|P ]]		[[Category:Culture & Learning \|P ]]
		+
		+	=Trends=
		+	==7.1 cr students take coachings: NSSO==
		+	[http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=71cr-students-take-pvttuitions-NSSO-report-Parallel-05042016001058 ''The Times of India''], Apr 05 2016
		+
		+	''' 7.1cr students take pvt tuitions: NSSO report Parallel '''
		+
		+	Subodh Varma
		+
		+	Arecent NSSO report has taken the veil off what is called the shadow education system -private coaching and tuition, outside and parallel to the mainstream education system. The number of students taking such coaching classes or tuitions is estimated at 7.1 crore, almost 26% of the total number of students in the country .Of these, 4.1 crore are boys and 3 crore are girls.
		+	The report estimates that about 11% to 12% of the total expenditure incurred by families goes for private coaching or tuitions. Contrary to expectation, poorer sections of society take recourse to pri vate coaching of kids practically as much as richer families, the report says. These details emerge from the NSSO report based on a survey of 66,000 households conducted in the first half of 2014.
		+
		+	However, NSSO estimates for populations have been known to vary from that of the Census. For example, Census 2011 counted 315 mil lion students as opposed to 273 million estimated by the NSSO. So, the number of students taking private coaching could well be higher than 7.1 crore. Over 89% of respondents said the main reason for going for private coaching was “augmenting basic education“. What they meant was that the schools were not up to the mark at least as perceived by the parents and students and hence they had to take supportive steps. Just four percent of the respondents said that private coaching was needed to prepare for exams for jobs or other educational institutes.
		+
		+	Among the poorest 20% of the rural population about 17% of students were taking coaching while this share rose to 25% for the richest fifth of the population. In urban areas, where coaching rates are generally higher, some 30% of students from the poorest fifth of the population went for coaching while the share was over 38 percent among the students from the richest 20%. This exhibits the widespread need felt for supplementary education.
		+
		+	At the state level, there was wide variation in the shares of students attending private coaching classes. The highest share was reported from Trip ura (81%) followed by West Bengal (78%). Expenditures on private coaching were also relatively high in these states while spending on course fees was on the lower side.
		+
		+	The survey found that students in govt. schools were spending more on private coaching with share such spend rising to 33% of the family's total spend on education when the kids were at the secondary stage. The flip side of the coin is that spending on education in private unaided institutions was 22 times that of government institutions